Share this article Share Married to Kristina's 34 year old father, retired Russian football star, Ruslan Pimenov, she is anxious to be seen as a responsible mother and to show that her daughter is a perfectly normal girl who happens to be stunningly beautiful with long honey blonde hair, piercing azure eyes and angelic facial features. And who has a rare talent as an iconic child model. Her portfolio from a remarkable six year 'career' is simply astonishing, including Vogue and Armani, yet critics see a dark side with one commentator branding a photo of her in shorts as 'creepy' while a male user wrote worryingly: Sitting in a fashionable Uzbek restaurant in the elite Krylatskoe district of Moscow, Glikeriya calmly sought to correct what she sees as the misplaced criticisms of her own motives, and her daughter's poses.
World's most beautiful girl Kristina Pimenova's mother defends pictures
Little girls model lingerie in 'Victoria's Secret'-style show [Video]
I think one of the tricky things with stuff like this is that the way the laws tend to be approached is by very arbitrary things: And that's not so great. Not only does it mean things like this go as they are, though they appear to be very exploitive, it also tends to result in cases which have happened where parents get charged with making child porn by developing family photos they took of their kids in the bathtub with no sexual motivation whatsoever. A site of a year-old in costumes generally intended for fetish models, making substantial money from posing for such from a demographic of adult men is clearly not the same arena as cute family bathtub photos. The purpose of this stuff is pretty clear here: